Posted by Nathanael (admin) on December 21st, 2007 in general
I was planning on simply posting machine laziness and feedback, until I was re-reading parts of Dan Saffer’s “Designing for interaction” this morning over breakfast and had a thought; made a connection.
Unfortunately I couldn’t find a an image of Hugh Dubberly’s system diagram on the Internet to link to - so hopefully you’re familiar with […]
Tags: ajax, canberracentre, design, error, feedback, interactiondesign, machine, systems, ux
Posted by Nathanael (admin) on July 30th, 2007 in general
If the function doesn’t take into account how the user works, their background and experience, how they need and want to use the function, then it can still fail.
Tags: ucd, userexperience, ux
Posted by Nathanael (admin) on March 28th, 2007 in general
Just some notes on the Web Standards Group (WSG) meeting in Canberra this afternoon.
Tags: canberra, craigerrey, design, ia, informationarchitecture, internet, microsoft, ptgglobal, shanemorris, ui, usability, userexperience, userinterface, ux, web, webstandards, webstandardsgroup, wsg
Posted by Nathanael (admin) on February 12th, 2007 in general
Who’s fault is it when you want X to happen, but somehow Y happens (and it’s not a bug in the software)?
Tags: design, interactiondesign, interface, software, ucd, ui, usability, userexperience, ux
Posted by Nathanael (admin) on January 18th, 2007 in general
I’ve just posted up some conclusions of studies from last year over at What does that sign mean.
Tags: design, ia, informationarchitecture, research, signs, ui, usability, userexperience, userinterface, ux, web
